Re: RE: RE: RE: Re: 4.7 SLT outruns the R/T 5.9

From: SS454454@aol.com
Date: Sat Jan 08 2000 - 13:08:59 EST

Next message: SS454454@aol.com: "Re: Hey Rob!!"
Previous message: Yllwdkta@aol.com: "Re: 2000 Chrysler Nationals (formerly C@C)"
Maybe in reply to: Barret, Matt: "RE: RE: RE: Re: 4.7 SLT outruns the R/T 5.9"
Next in thread: SuperNagz@aol.com: "Re: RE: RE: RE: Re: 4.7 SLT outruns the R/T 5.9"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

In a message dated 01/08/2000 12:55:03 PM !!!First Boot!!!,
MATT_BARRET@earthtech.com writes:

<< maybe like 3300 pounds, just a guess?? >>

Mine weighs in at a swelte 4400 pounds. its a xtra cab 4x4
Rob

Next message: SS454454@aol.com: "Re: Hey Rob!!"
Previous message: Yllwdkta@aol.com: "Re: 2000 Chrysler Nationals (formerly C@C)"
Maybe in reply to: Barret, Matt: "RE: RE: RE: Re: 4.7 SLT outruns the R/T 5.9"
Next in thread: SuperNagz@aol.com: "Re: RE: RE: RE: Re: 4.7 SLT outruns the R/T 5.9"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:46:33 EDT