Re: Group Dyno 4.7 vs 5.9 here we goooooooooooooooooooo!!!

From: George Hernandez (georgeh@tocquigny.com)
Date: Thu Jan 27 2000 - 01:13:58 EST


Hmmm... I got 218 at the rear. STOCK 99 RT w/ <3000 miles on the motor. Maybe my
truck is gifted but I have seen over 200HP from several people. Just my $.59

Aaron wrote:

> pardon me, no no no. I'm sorry but a 4.7 auto is making nowhere near 225 at
> the rear tires. The 5.9 (and I don't like that engine) makes approximately
> 175 at the rear wheels stock. The auto is horrible and sucks massive amounts
> of power away. Even a 4.7 manual couldn't be making that much because the
> manual setup still takes about 20 horses out. Your looking at 205 best with
> a manual.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Bob Tom <tigers@bserv.com>
> To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2000 5:23 PM
> Subject: Re: DML: Group Dyno 4.7 vs 5.9 here we goooooooooooooooooooo!!!
>
> > I hope that a '00 4.7 RC auto. makes it to your dyno tests.
> >
> > My guess from ETs posted so far from 4.7 owners would be
> > 225-230 hp at the rears and about 300 torque at the rears.
> > Peak torque at about 3400 rpm and peak hp at about 4900 rpm.
> >
> > Bob. Southern Ontario, Canada.
> > '97 Dakota CC Sport, FR, 5.2L, 3.55 SG, auto.
> >



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:47:09 EDT