Re: Drive shafts. Very weird.

From: Clay Cooke (cooke@ecn.purdue.edu)
Date: Thu Feb 03 2000 - 15:41:04 EST

Next message: Michael R. Nevarez: "RE: Tires"
Previous message: Stlaurent Mr Steven: "RE: Drive shafts. Very weird."
In reply to: Mike Schwall: "Re: Drive shafts. Very weird."
Next in thread: Cale Henry Bargen: "Re: Drive shafts. Very weird."
Reply: Cale Henry Bargen: "Re: Drive shafts. Very weird."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

last time I studied this was in my ME274 Dynamics class... the reason for
the larger diameter is for strength, and stiffness. A larger diameter
cyliner is stronger. And a "tube" configuration is stiffer in radial
motion than a solid tube...

Clay

84 Dodge Ram, scrappin pavement w/ 440 8bbl
96 Indy Ram, scrappin EVERYTHING w/ 360 Magnum!' -(www.indyram.org)
69 Road Runner 440 6bbl, project car

http://expert.cc.purdue.edu/~cooke

Next message: Michael R. Nevarez: "RE: Tires"
Previous message: Stlaurent Mr Steven: "RE: Drive shafts. Very weird."
In reply to: Mike Schwall: "Re: Drive shafts. Very weird."
Next in thread: Cale Henry Bargen: "Re: Drive shafts. Very weird."
Reply: Cale Henry Bargen: "Re: Drive shafts. Very weird."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:47:52 EDT