Re: R/T versus 5.0 Stang

From: Tim Berry (coolva1@home.com)
Date: Fri Feb 04 2000 - 07:01:07 EST


Hmm.. my friends 90 5.0 5 speed ran a 14.98 with 115K miles on it.. no
mods...
Watch out for um.. He'll prolly run 14.5ish?
__________________________________________________________
Tim Berry -- Chesapeake, VA
`97 SLT 318 auto CC 2x4 LSD:
Dual Exaust w/Flowmaster, Homemade K&N GEN II, 16" Electric Fan
180 T-stat, Accel 8.5's, Lakewood Traction Bars, F&B Stage 1 TB
ASP Pullies (Crank/Alt), Trans Go Shift Kit, BFG 275/60's, Hypertech PTM
BEST 1/4 15.836 @ 84.93 MPH (exaust, 180 stat, and wires only...)
ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ
----- Original Message -----
From: "Matt Keast" <mkeast@golden.net>
To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2000 12:38 AM
Subject: DML: R/T versus 5.0 Stang

> I'm sure this has been discussed a million times before but I'm curious
> since my friend has a
> '96 5.0 Mustang GT. I guess I'm wondering how things would trun out with
a
> Stock CC R/T against
> a Stock 5 Litre before I make a fool out of myself and get my doors blown
> off??
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:47:53 EDT