Steven, Sorry but it sure looked like you were favoring that Stang.
Dave Waco
Stlaurent Mr Steven wrote:
>
> Lynn;
>
> 0-60 5.2 for the 00 GT
> I have seen a new GT running high 13's in the 1/4.
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> Steven St.Laurent
> Test Engineer
> Test Branch, GSD,MCTSSA
> MARCORSYSCOM, US Marine Corps
> mailto:stlaurents@mctssa.usmc.mil (work)
> mailto:Saint1958@home.com (home)
> Office: (760) 725-2296
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lynn Pedersen [mailto:davewaco@sympatico.ca]
> Sent: Friday, February 04, 2000 8:52 AM
> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> Subject: Re: DML: R/T versus 5.0 Stang
>
> 2 seconds WHAT, WHO, HOW, Please explain, Thank You!
> 2 seconds sounds like a whole lot either way. ????????
>
> Stlaurent Mr Steven wrote:
> >
> > 2Seconds faster in the 0-60 run and 2 seconds faster on the 1/4 mile.
> >
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------
> > Steven St.Laurent
> > Test Engineer
> > Test Branch, GSD,MCTSSA
> > MARCORSYSCOM, US Marine Corps
> > mailto:stlaurents@mctssa.usmc.mil (work)
> > mailto:Saint1958@home.com (home)
> > Office: (760) 725-2296
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Alan Short [mailto:ashort@flash.net]
> > Sent: Friday, February 04, 2000 9:20 AM
> > To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> > Subject: Re: DML: R/T versus 5.0 Stang
> >
> > Matt Keast wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm sure this has been discussed a million times before but I'm curious
> > > since my friend has a
> > > '96 5.0 Mustang GT. I guess I'm wondering how things would trun out
> with
> > a
> > > Stock CC R/T against
> > > a Stock 5 Litre before I make a fool out of myself and get my doors
> blown
> > > off??
> >
> > Stock for stock, I'd say it's gonna be close....give it a shot!
> > I wish I knew I'd win every race I got into!
> > Won a bunch...lost a bunch more....that's racing.
> > Alan S.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:47:53 EDT