No offence taken by me ( probably the most stock 6 on the list). I have
beaten a Mustang 6 before... could have been driver, but I've beaten him
more than once, so maybe not. I also have a 4x4... something not set up to
drag. And I don't have the nice aerodynamics that the 97+ Daks have.... I
think it's a pretty fair fight.
I will concede to numbers, finding numbers on BOTH engines isn't the easiest
thing in the world.
-Robert Howe
1995 V6 4x4
-----Original Message-----
From: Lynn Pedersen <davewaco@sympatico.ca>
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Date: Monday, February 07, 2000 2:06 PM
Subject: Re: DML: R/T versus 5.0 Stang
>No offence to Dakota V6 owners. We are talking about a Mustang V6
>here!!!
> Dave Waco
>
>
>Terri Pryer wrote:
>>
>> Oh really. That dosen't surprise me at all.
>> Mark
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Lynn Pedersen <davewaco@sympatico.ca>
>> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
>> Date: Monday, February 07, 2000 9:32 AM
>> Subject: Re: DML: R/T versus 5.0 Stang
>>
>> >Terry, Hi! The answer is no. He's off in Dreamland driving a V6!!!
>> > Dave Waco
>> >
>> >
>> >Terri Pryer wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Did they ever put 5.0s in the 98 body style? I have seen a guy with
that
>> >> badge on the rear where the svt logo would normally be and was
wondering?
>> >> Mark
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: NVMYDakota@aol.com <NVMYDakota@aol.com>
>> >> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
>> >> Date: Sunday, February 06, 2000 8:54 PM
>> >> Subject: Re: DML: R/T versus 5.0 Stang
>> >>
>> >> >In a message dated 2/6/00 9:33:35 PM Mountain Standard Time,
>> >> >mkeast@golden.net writes:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Sorry about that......it's acutally a 95' 5.0 Mustang. I had the
>> year
>> >> >> wrong....I couldn't remember
>> >> >> if it was '95 or '96 that was the last year of the 5 litre.
Anyways,
>> I
>> >> >> pretty much figured that I would
>> >> >> have trouble keeping up with a 5.0 Stang...atleast off the line.
>> From
>> >> what
>> >> >> I've noticed it seems very fast early on but abit sluggish in
higher
>> >> gears.
>> >> >> It's fast but I'm not impressed with it otherwise.
>> >> >> Lots of rattles coming from everywhere (very annoying) just
doens't
>> feel
>> >> >> like it is well put together.
>> >> >> I will probably give it a try anyway!....
>> >> >
>> >> >Wow I am very sorry to hear this, I found a Semi Modded Rustang
(Exhaust
>> >> and
>> >> >Intake) Just like me(well mine a Dakota...) Anyways, I showd this
idiot
>> >> what
>> >> >Magnum Power meant.... He had a Big Ol 5.0L sticker diagonally
across
>> on
>> >> teh
>> >> >rear quater panel! damn this was too much fun.... The only car I
won't
>> >> mess
>> >> >wiht are those 5.0 Cobras, there pretty damned fast,
>> >> >
>> >> >As for the Fit and Finish of mustangs, the feel like they were made
in
>> >> >Mexico(Mexican quality) and it seemed like somone dumped ina buncha
>> >> Mexican
>> >> >Jumpin Beans, ratlles and noises everywhere, I see why every mustang
has
>> a
>> >> >loud stereo!!!!!!!!!!
>> >> >
>> >> > Greg
>> >> >
>> >> >PS even my OLD 1993 Dakota was quiter than taht damned mustang!
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >
>> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:47:56 EDT