Re: Re: 5.2 vs4.7

From: mike d. (miggitymike@juno.com)
Date: Mon Feb 14 2000 - 02:45:10 EST


saw a 4.7 CC Auto runnin' low 15's at Cecil.... haven't seen a stock 318
CC do that yet... sorry. Love the trusty 318, but the 4.7 is just a
better motor...

-mike d.

---> Yorktown, Va.
88 Dakota LE: slammed, painted, and PARKED =(

miggitymike@juno.com
http://members.xoom.com/dakotaperf/index.html

On Sat, 12 Feb 2000 15:55:19 EST BoogYT1300@aol.com writes:
> In a message dated 2/12/00 11:43:03 AM Pacific Standard Time,
> acolona@i-55.com writes:
>
> <<
> > Does anybody have an opinion. Is there anybody that has a 4.7
> that
> wishes
> > they had a 5.2?
> >
> > Long live the 318
> >>
> I had a 92 318 and it is still awesome, even with th stock computer
> and
> exhaust. I left the JBA's on when I sold it to my Grandfather.
> I bought a 00 with the 4.7l and I have to say it runs just as good
> as the
> 318. I too had my doubts when I bought it, it was too different,
> plus the
> tranny seemed to want to rob even more from the engine. However,
> after
> breaking her in, it runs just as good as my ol 318 did.
> In fact the OHC eliminates the lag in middle-to top end of second
> gear. I
> like this engine, just wish the 46RE could be mated to it.
> Unfortunately the 318 is dead and gone, make way for the OHC Hemi's!
> Boog

________________________________________________________________
YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET!
Juno now offers FREE Internet Access!
Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:48:05 EDT