RE: Drivetrain Loss

From: Steve St.Laurent (saint1958@home.com)
Date: Wed Feb 16 2000 - 21:39:57 EST


I would disagree with amount lost. It is good engineering to optimized the
throughput to rear with adding HP. I have seen dyno engines loose only less
than 18 percent (485HP) on a Mustang 4.6L.

=================================
Steve St.Laurent
2000 DC Dakota 4.7, CC, 4x2, 3:55 (soon 330HP)
2000 Roush Mustang Stage I (awaiting the new SC)

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net]On Behalf Of Mike Schwall
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2000 2:51 PM
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Subject: Re: DML: Drivetrain Loss

At 11:48 PM 2/15/2000 -0500, you wrote:
>In a message dated 02/15/2000 11:11:42 PM !!!First Boot!!!,
>mschwall@flash.net writes:
>
><< Could someone shed some light on this for me? >>
>its a matter of differnece in percentages. the more Hp the higher loss.
you
>will lose the same amount of hp ( percentage wise) so if you make 1000 hp
>you loose 250. if you make 2000 hp you loose 500 hp. its all relative to
the
>begining amount of hp.
>rOB

People need to learn how to edit messages for replies. It's real simple to
use the right email address when quoting a message for reply. It's not
that hard to figure out, really.

Mike

__________________________
mschwall@flash.net



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:48:09 EDT