Damn...did they give you a jar of Vaseline with the truck? ;)
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net]On Behalf Of Sam Parthemer
Sent: Tuesday, February 29, 2000 6:06 PM
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Subject: Re: DML: RE: RE: CA Truck Registration?
That's NOTHING. My wife's '99 RT was $635.00 the
first year, prior to the new 25% reduction. Talk
about bend over.
Sam '00 RT
--- "Bernd D. Ratsch" <bernd@texas.net> wrote:
> My original registration was $435/year. However,
> the move to Texas brought
> that down to $65.
>
> (God bless Texas)
>
> - Bernd
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net]On Behalf Of
> SmokinDakota
> Sent: Tuesday, February 29, 2000 5:03 PM
> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> Subject: DML: RE: CA Truck Registration?
>
>
> Is it that bad? My 97 Dak has personal plates and
> the registration is only
> $231. My girlfriends 97 Nissan Sentra car has
> regular tags and her
> registration is around $250.
>
> Steven
> http://www.smokindakota.com
> http://www.dodge-trucks.net (coming soon)
> AOL IM = SmknDakTrk
> ICQ = 42763370
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net]On Behalf Of
> Stlaurent Mr Steven
> Sent: Tuesday, February 29, 2000 7:23 AM
> To: 'dakota-truck@buffnet.net'
> Subject: DML: RE: RE: RE: CA Truck Registration?
>
>
> Your license would read example 4N12345: this is a
> commercial plate. I am
> seriously considering a class-action lawsuit against
> the state of
> California. Apparently, if you don't have a rear
> camper shell the truck is
> considered a commercial vehicle and makes no
> difference that you have a
> business license or not. The charge for an
> commercial plate is higher than
> regular plates.
>
> Since truck body vehicle are now selling about 73
> percent of the current
> sales market here in California, I think I have
> enough evidence to prove my
> case in court. Commercial vehicle could be cars,
> motorcycles, or trucks
> (SUV, SUT, or panel vans). If the vehicle is solely
> use for commercial than
> it should registered as commercial but not a Dakota
> for recreational
> driving.
>
>
-----------------------------------------------------------------
> Steven St.Laurent
> Test Engineer
> Test Branch, GSD,MCTSSA
> MARCORSYSCOM, US Marine Corps
> mailto:stlaurents@mctssa.usmc.mil (work)
> mailto:Saint1958@home.com (home)
> Office: (760) 725-2296
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bernd D. Ratsch [mailto:bernd@texas.net]
> Sent: Monday, February 28, 2000 5:09 PM
> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> Subject: DML: RE: RE: CA Truck Registration?
>
>
> I took a look at my invoice and all the "fixin's" on
> it...no mention of
> commercial. (Date of Purchase: 3/97 from San Jose,
> CA)
>
> - Bernd
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> Subject: DML: RE: CA Truck Registration?
>
> Commerial. All trucks in CA. are considered
> commericial.
>
> Good thing-- you can park in ANY yellow zone for up
> to 20 minutes.
> ALSO-- if you have a commercial vehicle, the license
> plate will be
> #A##### (#=number, A=Letter)..Unless it's a
> personalized plate...
>
> Bad thing -- you have to pay a little more $$$ for a
> commercial truck
> tag valued at $25000 vs. a car tag valued at $25000.
>
> Sam '00 RT
>
>
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:49:01 EDT