RE: CC vs. QC

From: Josh Stolarz (jstolarz@loa.com)
Date: Fri Mar 17 2000 - 18:43:02 EST


I was pondering my decision on the CC, the QC would be nice for seating. But
I need that extra room in the bed, and a bed that can handle heavier
weights. During the winter I often carry a 650lb snowmobile in the back that
is 8ft long. From what I have hear in past post's the QC's bed's can't
handle as much weight as a normal Dak, something to with frame or something.
There was a post about this awhile back..

Josh

>Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2000 13:45:01 PST
>From: "Frank Johnson" <frankwjohnson@hotmail.com>
>Subject: DML: CC vs. QC

>I was just wondering how many owners of CC's think they should have gotten
>the QC's instead?
>I was just thinkin about the seating issue, and for me the longer bed of
the
>CC was more attractive before. But seing as i wish i could carry more
>people more comfortably, and don't use the whole bed all that often, i
think
>i'll be getting a QC next. Maybe in about 2 years time when i've payed off
>the 2000 Dak.
>Just wondering,

>Frank WJ



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:49:48 EDT