Mines at 115... is shifts into overdrive at 110... (that blows too..) I was
hopin fer more... but 115 in a truck is kinda scary on a windy bridge =-)
btw, last week, on the same bridge... i hung right next to, if not creeped
up on my friend in his 5.0 5 speed, that is till we got to 110, I let off
cuz I knew I was gonna stop soon anyways =-)
My friend that was ridin with him said he was sayin "Bout Time" when I let
off.... =-)
I love my dak!
__________________________________________________________
Tim Berry -- Chesapeake, VA
`97 SLT 318 auto CC 2x4 LSD:
Dual Exaust w/Flowmaster, Homemade K&N GEN II, 16" Electric Fan
180 T-stat, MSD 8.5 wires, Lakewood Traction Bars, F&B Stage 1 TB. Mod'd
intake
ASP Pullies (Crank/Alt), Trans Go Shift Kit, BFG 275/60's, Hypertech PTM
(gettin fixed)
BEST 1/4 15.488 @ 86.23 MPH
ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim J Koth" <Tim.J.Koth@aexp.com>
To: "dakota-truck%buffnet.net" <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2000 4:49 PM
Subject: DML: Was: New to List/Dakota rec. Now: Speed limiter
> I had my Dak up to about 102 recently with no sign of the speed limiter.
I
> thought I was going maybe 85 till I looked down and about crapped..)
Anyway,
> there was a thread about 2 months ago about that and it was obvious tha
the
> speed limiter is not consistently applied across vehicles. I'd bet the
same is
> true of the Toyotas. Some probably cut out before others. For me, I
started
> worrying about those Goodyear Wranglers, they aren't speed rated at all
and
> the thought of one coming apart at 102 mph gives me acute sphincter
> pucker.......
>
> -------- previous post ----------
>
> Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2000 10:30:42 -0800
> From: Stlaurent Mr Steven <STLAURENTS@mctssa.usmc.mil>
> Subject: DML: RE: Re: New to List/Dakota rec.
>
> I agree with exception to the speed limiter that stopped me after 97MPH
> beating up the Tacoma V-6. I laughed because it took him sometime to
catch
> up then pass me.
>
>
> Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2000 11:43:04 -0800
> From: Stlaurent Mr Steven <STLAURENTS@mctssa.usmc.mil>
> Subject: DML: RE: RE: RE: RE: HP RATINGS NEED
>
> Let us try that again the CC 4.7 is much lighter than the R/T 5.9 CC. The
> numbers are upside down.
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:49:48 EDT