I prefer my Club Cab over the Quad cab because it was cheaper, had a longer
bed for hauling, and is probably faster.
However, IF I EVER THOUGHT ABOUT STICKING SOMEBODY IN THE BACKSEAT, I would
have gotten the Quad cab. Not much is fitting back there but my golf
clubs!
In fact my golf clubs is precisely why I got a club cab. Nobody is fitting
behind me, I drive with the seat ALL the way back. Twice I put a single
person behind the passenger. It was okay for a short trip if you're
talking about a small person. My 5'6" buddy wasn't exacly pleased with the
accomodations. And that was with My 5'3" wife riding in front with the
seat forward. Don't even think about 6 people. Billy Barty isn't in great
health. And Leprecauns tend to chew on the upholstery.
Steve Ekstrand, Pasadena, CA Driver: '00 Dakota CC SLT+ 4.7L 3.92SG 255's
Stacey's Driver: '00 Inferno Red Intrepid ES-3.2L-24V Autostick w/Leather
Race Car: 69 1/2 Road Runner 440-6 (ex-NHRA SS/GA future B or C/SA???)
Project Car: 69 Barracuda Notchback (Orig. 318, now 360w/Edelbrock Heads)
Homepage: http://sites.netscape.net/professormopar/homepage
----- Original Message -----
From: "Frank Johnson" <frankwjohnson@hotmail.com>
To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2000 1:45 PM
Subject: DML: CC vs. QC
| I was just wondering how many owners of CC's think they should have
gotten
| the QC's instead?
| I was just thinkin about the seating issue, and for me the longer bed of
the
| CC was more attractive before. But seing as i wish i could carry more
| people more comfortably, and don't use the whole bed all that often, i
think
| i'll be getting a QC next. Maybe in about 2 years time when i've payed
off
| the 2000 Dak.
| Just wondering,
|
| Frank WJ
| ______________________________________________________
| Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
|
|
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:49:48 EDT