RE: engine size poll

From: Bernd D. Ratsch (bernd@texas.net)
Date: Tue May 02 2000 - 19:07:58 EDT

Next message: Jon Smith: "funny rice spotting"
Previous message: Bob Tom: "Re: engine size poll"
In reply to: Bob Tom: "Re: engine size poll"
Next in thread: Jon Smith: "Re: engine size poll"
Reply: Jon Smith: "Re: engine size poll"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Now now Bob. I still have more HP than you and a lot more TQ
(381ft.lbs.)...on a V6. ;)

- Bernd

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net]On Behalf Of Bob Tom
Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2000 6:54 PM
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Subject: Re: DML: engine size poll

At 04:45 PM 5/2/00 -0500, you wrote:
>WooHoo!!!!
>V6'ers are at the top of the list!! :)

But, the're at the bottom of the performance charts!! :)

Bob. Ontario, Canada.
'97 Dakota CC, 5.2L, 3.92 SG, auto.
Corrected max. rwhp = 227.4 Corrected max. rwtq = 335.0 lb-ft
PB 14.85 sec @ 91.67 mph

Next message: Jon Smith: "funny rice spotting"
Previous message: Bob Tom: "Re: engine size poll"
In reply to: Bob Tom: "Re: engine size poll"
Next in thread: Jon Smith: "Re: engine size poll"
Reply: Jon Smith: "Re: engine size poll"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:51:11 EDT