Re: RE: spiralmax

From: Marty Galyean (mgalyean@acm.org)
Date: Fri May 05 2000 - 10:07:30 EDT


With regards to 'air spinning intake devices' -- seems to me that any time you
get air spinning as it goes through a tube or enclosed space you are going to
increase
friction between the air mass and the walls of the space simply because of
centrifugal force.

This would perhaps be countered, or reigned in, somewhat by the vacuum in the
center much like a tornado but I can't see how this changes the basic fact
that more,
denser air is scrubbing against the walls of the tube or container. Either
way it just puts more load on the vacuum and thus the engine.

This would seem to lower V.E. or volumetric efficiency; more work to move same
amount of air.

But maybe some intakes are so oddly designed that spinning air has less
turbulence than non but that seems fundamentally broken to me, not sure why
other than
what I already wrote.

"Bernd D. Ratsch" wrote:

> Looks almost identical to the "Tornado" (http://www.tornadoair.com/). I
> actually tried the Tornado and found that it caused a restriction in the
> intake tube and didn't give me (or my wife's Jeep) any more power or better
> fuel economy. Don't bother with it...just my opinion.
>
> - Bernd
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net]On Behalf Of MLytle96@aol.com
> Sent: Friday, May 05, 2000 4:54 AM
> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> Subject: DML: spiralmax
>
> Anyone ever tried one of these......??
> www.spiralmax.com
>
> j



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:51:12 EDT