cool thanks. time for me to install my 180 ;-)
>From: "Bernd D. Ratsch" <bernd@texas.net>
>Reply-To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
>To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
>Subject: DML: Re: 160 vs 180 t-stat
>Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 09:04:56 -0500
>
>Yes. The computer switches into closed loop at around 150 (lots of
>variable
>involved but that's the average).
>
>- Bernd
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Justin Sanders" <colonel_sanders0@hotmail.com>
>To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
>Sent: Friday, May 12, 2000 8:56 AM
>Subject: DML: 160 vs 180 t-stat
>
>
> > ok ok I know this has probably already been disscussed but I always
>thought
> > colder is better and the 160 is colder. But what I've seen is most
>DMLers
> > are using 180... is the 160 tooooo cold? but then why would they have it
>as
> > an option to buy? Thank you whoever responds...
> >
> > Sanders
> > 95 Dak 318 SLT 2wd, FIPK
> > ________________________________________________________________________
> > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
> >
> >
>
________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:51:17 EDT