Thanks for the info Jim. Your follow-up post was exactly what I wanted. I can
sympathize with you on how to address a company's problems. And in your third
update you did exactly that without giving any detailed specifics. For me
though, the first couple posts were like a big tease!! :-)
I mean, you just said don't do it but then left us hanging. Thats the only
part that got me. Kinda like a first date with no kiss... heh heh
I think your follow-up explained your situation perfectly. The other guy I
think posted the info he dug up because he actually called Mesa and then
passed on the info to the list. Now someone can put the 3 days or so worth of
info together and make their own decisions. Thanks for your insight!! -
Tim Koth
---- Jim Wrote ----
>Date: Sat, 03 Jun 2000 19:42:52 -0700
>From: jdharmon@earthlink.net
>Subject: Re: DML: Mesa headers and why somebody might gripe...
>GI agree with *you* Tim -- I don't understand why one would slam them without
>> substantiating their claims. Doesn't make any sense.
>>
>Anyone on this list that knows me will understand. Airing of a company's
>problems doesn't help anyone. I have my views and chose not to provide the
>specifics. Needless to say, if you have any problems with their product, it
>will be a very long and drawn out process. I still say, which apparently
nobody
>remembers, that they make a great header.
>Any problems with that?? Did you even read the post from last night???
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:51:39 EDT