RE: Re: unorganized mail

From: Chapell, Ron (RChapell@rlps.com)
Date: Thu Jul 13 2000 - 14:44:16 EDT


i figured it was something like that and like it said it is no big deal.
just funny. thanks for the info though.

chapell

-----Original Message-----
From: Matt Schroeder [mailto:schroema@hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2000 2:37 PM
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Subject: DML: Re: unorganized mail

Well internet transfer of data through servers and such isn't a linear
system that is the same every time. It all depends on how much load each
system the data has to go through has on it at the time.

You might get lucky once in a while and zap a message to the list and out to
everyone rather quick, and a reply might take longer... It's all about
load.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Chapell, Ron" <RChapell@rlps.com>
To: "Dlm (E-mail)" <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2000 12:52 PM
Subject: DML: unorganized mail

> I think it is kind of funny when I receive a response to a question before
I
> even receive the original inquiry. I guess it is no big deal and I am sure
> someone has pointed this out before, but I am stupefied as to how this
could
> take place. Any responses? Lets see if I get this piece before someone's
> reply! ;>)
>
> chapell
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:52:37 EDT