Well, here is my email and reply to and from Carlisle. These people are,
and have been very nice to speak
with everytime I've done so. Looks like we can look forward to a couple new
classes next year.
Rich - Ashburn, VA
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Rich Wisotzkey <rich.wisotzkey@gsc.gte.com>
> To: <info@ifounditatcarlisle.com>
> Sent: Monday, July 17, 2000 3:09 PM
> Subject: Something to Consider; Please?
>
> > Hello,
> > I'd like you to think about making a change in your truck catagories for
> > next years Chrysler show. The Dakota's were totally re-designed between
> > '96 and '97. Yet the two years are in the same catagory for judging.
> > Grouping the '96's with the '95's, and grouping the '97's with the '98's
> > would be a better balance than the present grouping. Is this something
> > you would consider doing to level the field?
> >
> > One other question since I have your attention. I noticed seeing
> > extremely modified vehicles in the same class as extremely stock
> > vehicles. Have you considered possibly making a class separation
> > between stock to slightly modified, and modified to extremely modified?
> > Thank you very much. I will look forward to hearing back from you.
> > Sincerely,
> > Rich Wisotzkey
> >
Rich - thanks for the input on year breaks - I have copied your e-mail
and will put it in the file for 2000. It is always helpful to get
information from someone that knows the vehicle first hand. Regarding
Stock vs modified. We had many make that comment. We will add a
modified class for 2001. Not sure there is enough numbers to support two
levels of modified. But as the classes grow we will continue to add.
Again thanks for your comments they are very helpful.
Lisa
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:52:42 EDT