To get a 5.9 cummins diesel under the hood of a Dakota would be damn near
impossible. Do you realize they weigh about 2,000 pounds?
Kyle Kozubal wrote:
> Other than finding some, yet still limited info, concerning the
> agricultural 3.9L 4cylinder....I havent found any solid info concering this
> engine. I found it mentioned two times lately in 4WD Magazines:
> #1: Four Wheeler, August 2000 Issue; Page 26
> #2 4Wheel & Off-Road, August 2000; Pages 114-116
>
> I did find this link, under 'construction engines' with the Cummins website:
> http://www.cummins.com/na/pages/en/products/construction/b39.cfm
>
> It has been shown in a
> In one article, it said the 3.9L uses a Holset Turbo and makes 130hp at
> 2,500 RPM and 350 lb-ft of torque at 1,500 RPM. The website linked above
> shows very very similar engine stats as the magazine listed, including the
> Cummins Holset Turbocharger. These stats may be fine for a 'rock buggy' or
> when it is bolted down into a lightweight CJ5, but a heavy Dakota......I
> would rather have the 5.9L Cummins. But then again, I would just love to
> have a torqued out diesel under the hood, how cool would that be!
> Kyle
> 93 Dakota 4x4 V6
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:52:50 EDT