RE: Re: Re: DML and Patent violation problem

From: Ronald Wong (ron-wong@home.com)
Date: Thu Aug 03 2000 - 17:37:42 EDT


I agree with Matt. As long as Rob's not trying to make money selling his
fabrication he's got nothing to worry about. If he is trying to make money
there could be a problem even if he thought of it first. He didn't try to
patent his idea so I'm sure there'd be a fight there.

Ron

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net]On Behalf Of Matt Schroeder
Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2000 2:16 PM
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Subject: DML: Re: Re: DML and Patent violation problem

That's nothing but TOTAL BULL. If you're not selling anything you can't be
infringing on patent rights. Patent law was designed for the sole reason to
protect people's rights to designs and ideas that are marketable from being
produced and SOLD by others.

Politely tell them to jump in a lake. :-)

If this were true I wouldn't be able to fabricate anything for myself
because most all worthy items are patented.

Matt Schroeder
Burnsville, MN



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:53:15 EDT