RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Tired of getting slammed 4.7L TQ curve

From: Stlaurent Mr Steven (STLAURENTS@mctssa.usmc.mil)
Date: Wed Aug 30 2000 - 17:22:28 EDT


I added a 8PSI, the HP would be 329HP and the Torque would range 440LB.
Close.

-------------------------------------------
Steven St.Laurent
Test Engineer
Test Branch, GSD, MCTSSA
MARCORSYSCOM, USMC
760-725-2506 (DSN 365-2506)
Work:mailto:stlaurents@mctssa.usmc.mil
Home:mailto:saint1958@home.com

 -----Original Message-----
From: Bernd D. Ratsch [mailto:bernd@texas.net]
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2000 1:33 PM
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Subject: DML: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Tired of getting slammed 4.7L TQ
curve

Psst...mine made 381ft.lbs. ;)

- Bernd

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net]On Behalf Of Barret, Matt
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2000 3:14 PM
To: 'dakota-truck@buffnet.net'
Subject: DML: RE: RE: RE: RE: Tired of getting slammed 4.7L TQ curve

I have stated before, you can't go by those crappy dyno graphs that DC puts
on the website, I mean come on, look at the 3.9L graph they have on there,
their graph says the 3.9L is making 280+ Ftlbs of TQ ???? I'll email you my
dyno graph, take a look at it, it will change your mind about the 4.7L.
Compare it to the 4.7L graph on the internet.

Matt



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:53:50 EDT