Re: I always knew my 3.9 was much faster than those little 4.7s!

• Next message: mike d.: "Re: Plain ol laying around injectors"
• Previous message: DICEMAN469@aol.com: "Re: FMU's ---> was: Injectors"
• Maybe in reply to: Steve Preston: "I always knew my 3.9 was much faster than those little 4.7s!"
• Next in thread: SEMIHEMI01@aol.com: "Re: I always knew my 3.9 was much faster than those little 4.7s!"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

In a message dated 8/30/00 10:43:47 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
steve318@webtv.net writes:

<< It`s because my V6 has less rotating mass! I knew it!! I tell ya,those
4.7s are real DOGS as far as acceleration.I mean it`s just NOT THERE!
But my 3.9? SHOOOOWEE!!

>>

No, Its there, Just not optimized. Yes you have a shorter stroke so more off
line power, well...when I get the 4:10's in my dak we'll see what happens.
Boog

• Next message: mike d.: "Re: Plain ol laying around injectors"
• Previous message: DICEMAN469@aol.com: "Re: FMU's ---> was: Injectors"
• Maybe in reply to: Steve Preston: "I always knew my 3.9 was much faster than those little 4.7s!"
• Next in thread: SEMIHEMI01@aol.com: "Re: I always knew my 3.9 was much faster than those little 4.7s!"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:53:53 EDT