At 01:57 PM 9/2/00 +0000, you wrote:
>I know the MPI works great on our trucks, I was just saying that I finally
>read a magazine article that agreed it didn't lose low end
>torque! Usually they just do like Mopar Now and tell some R/T owner that
>there's no way it will work. Maybe they should subscribe to the DML and
>see how many of them DO work.
Brett,
What article was this? I saw one recently pitting the M1 against the
Edelbrock RPM on a carb'd motor; is that the same article or was this a
different one? I'd be interested in reading that article to see what they
have to say, especially if it was the MPI on a Magnum motor.
FYI: I've got a couple of dyno comparisons up on my web site. There's
not really enough data to draw a complete conclusion, but if nothing else,
it does dismiss the idea that the MPI takes away your low-end. In fact, on
the truck those runs were done on (Bob Tom's) it gave him almost 30lb-ft
over the MPI as low as 1300 RPMs (can't chassis-dyno much lower than that).
Oops, a URL would help. :-) http://www.steigerperformance.com/benefits/
-Jon-
.--- Jon Steiger ---- jon@dakota-truck.net or stei0302@cs.fredonia.edu ---.
| Affiliations: AOPA, DoD, EAA, NMA, NRA, SPA, USUA; Rec & UL Pilot - SEL |
| '92 Ram 150 4x4 V8, '96 Dakota V8, '96 Intruder 1400, '96 FireFly 447 |
`------------------------------ http://www.cs.fredonia.edu/~stei0302/ ----'
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:54:22 EDT