Well thanks for the flowers, Sean. :)
I never assume that the factory figures are BS. Sometimes they are high and
sometimes they are low. For stock R/Ts, the rear wheel numbers I have seen are
just about on target.
I just kinda get a kick out of the fact that you got so upset because I
disagreed with you, hehe.
It's OK for someone to disagree, dude.
Sean Bruckman wrote:
> a smart guy like you (i read your posts), i expected, would know that
> factory figures are b.s.
> i just got ticked when you kept repeating them. already apologized off-list
> so i'm done.
>
> sean
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Jack Hilton <hemi@charter.net>
> To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2000 11:10 AM
> Subject: Re: DML: R/T difference Re: Jack
>
> > Gee, Sean.......how diplomatic.
> >
> > "I don't wanna call Jack an idiot, but Jack, you're an idiot!"
> >
> > All I stated about the HP and Torque figures was what is published by DC.
> If you
> > think that is incorrect, then you have to talk to them.
> > And if you want to think that I don't know what I am talking about, then
> that is
> > your opinion.
> >
> > Jack
> >
> > Sean Bruckman wrote:
> >
> > > I'll tell ya what guys... i don't want to call anybody an idiot for not
> > > thinking the same as me, but i do know two things:
> > >
> > > 1. Matt Barret knows what the hell he's talking about.
> > > 2. Steven Laurent knows what the hell he's talking about.
> > >
> > > Sean
> > >
> > > (sorry, not a flame -- so much as a restrained flame)
> > >
> > > "no replacement for displacement, if you exclude technology and
> therefore
> > > efficiency"
> > > "my engine was designed on a sophisticated computer a couple years ago,
> not
> > > penned five decades ago"
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:54:26 EDT