Terry,
See both Matts and Sams Dyno numbers it is almost even on the RWHP.
-------------------------------------------
Steven St.Laurent
Test Engineer
Test Branch, GSD, MCTSSA
MARCORSYSCOM, USMC
760-725-2506 (DSN 365-2506)
Work:mailto:stlaurents@mctssa.usmc.mil
Home:mailto:saint1958@home.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Terry Herrin [mailto:therrin@isaac.net]
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2000 8:57 PM
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Subject: Re: DML: R/T difference Re: Jack
"Steven St.Laurent" <Saint1958@home.com> wrote:
>First, I drove both also but the there was no 4.7 in 1999. The 99 R/T five
>speed had a great off-the-line start but with the parasitic loss the 4.7
>will catch it in the end. Now for the HO PCM, this will equal out the
I think the thing to keep in mind here is that we are comparing two
engines, not complete power trains. A 4.7 5 speed will keep up with a
5.9 automatic, but the automatic loses much more power than the 5
speed. Therefore, the 5.9 has to be putting out enough additional
power to make up for the extra loss of the automatic. Put a 5 speed
behind the 5.9 so it could go head to head with the 4.7 on even terms,
and the 4.7 would be seeing nothing but tailgate.
Terry Herrin
99 FR CC RT
14.769 @ 91.43
Wilmington, NC
Dakota R/T Club,Executive Board,SE Region
http://users.isaac.net/therrin/dakota.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:54:26 EDT