RE: Re:4.7vsR/T- dyno #'s

From: Stlaurent Mr Steven (STLAURENTS@mctssa.usmc.mil)
Date: Wed Sep 06 2000 - 12:05:07 EDT


Try those mobile units and ensure that the windshield meets the DOT
standards. I replaced my Chebby unit for 189.00 on my 99.

-------------------------------------------
Steven St.Laurent
Test Engineer
Test Branch, GSD, MCTSSA
MARCORSYSCOM, USMC
760-725-2506 (DSN 365-2506)
Work:mailto:stlaurents@mctssa.usmc.mil
Home:mailto:saint1958@home.com

 -----Original Message-----
From: AlexNReed [mailto:alexreed@home.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2000 8:44 AM
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Subject: Re: DML: Re:4.7vsR/T- dyno #'s

Its a Kenne Bell cold air intake with the K&N filter. Not just more power
but
it sounds great too! I will eventually get it dynoed again, I am saving for
headers and am going to have the chassis dyno shop install them, they said
we
could run before and after dyno's to really see the improvements. It will be
awhile. I need shocks and a new windshield first, anybody know where to get
the best deal on a new windshield for my '99 Dak?

Alex

Bob Tom wrote:

> At 09:47 AM 9/6/00 -0400, you wrote:
> > my '99 318 dak. dyno's numbers are: 198 rear hp and 257 rear pnd ft. tq.
> with
> >only a dual exhaust , I wonder what it'll do now that I added a cold are
> intake?
> >Any thoughts. Alex
>
> It would probably depend on the type of cold air intake that you added.
> My guess based on personal observations and what I've read is a bump to
> over 200 hp
> (probably around 203-205) and low 260 torque. I'd be sure interested in
> knowing
> if/whenever you have it dynoed again.
>
> Bob



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:54:26 EDT