Re: Re: 4.7 Tq vs 5.9 R/T

From: Marty Galyean (mgalyean@acm.org)
Date: Thu Sep 07 2000 - 10:56:22 EDT

Next message: Y2KDakuda@aol.com: "Powerdyne on e-bay"
Previous message: Stlaurent Mr Steven: "RE: Re: 2001 5.9 R/T"
In reply to: Jack Hilton: "Re: Re: 4.7 Tq vs 5.9 R/T"
Next in thread: DEREK BROOKS: "Re: Re: 4.7 Tq vs 5.9 R/T"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

I the 5.7 hemi still a go? If so, that thing is going to be a true monster.

Jack Hilton wrote:

> Yeah, I thought more about the weight of the engines and I bet you the 4.7 is
> considerably lighter. I dunno about how much the trannies weight diff. is. maybe
> 50 lbs (?)

Next message: Y2KDakuda@aol.com: "Powerdyne on e-bay"
Previous message: Stlaurent Mr Steven: "RE: Re: 2001 5.9 R/T"
In reply to: Jack Hilton: "Re: Re: 4.7 Tq vs 5.9 R/T"
Next in thread: DEREK BROOKS: "Re: Re: 4.7 Tq vs 5.9 R/T"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:54:27 EDT