Re: First year for mgnum engines?

From: Hemikota@aol.com
Date: Fri Sep 08 2000 - 21:09:00 EDT

Next message: Cal Hyer: "Re: '87 Dakota idling problem"
Previous message: Andy Levy: "Re: attn ANDY in DENVER"
Maybe in reply to: The Stewarts: "First year for mgnum engines?"
Next in thread: WillTier@aol.com: "Re: First year for mgnum engines?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

In a message dated 9/8/00 8:33:18 PM Eastern Daylight Time, WillTier@aol.com
writes:

<< I thought it was 230 for both of them in 93 ? But the torque was more for
the
360 ?

I know the 92 had 235, probably some due to the bigger exh. manifolds. The
318 dropped 5 hp in 93. Dont know about the 360 except torque is better.
Boog

Next message: Cal Hyer: "Re: '87 Dakota idling problem"
Previous message: Andy Levy: "Re: attn ANDY in DENVER"
Maybe in reply to: The Stewarts: "First year for mgnum engines?"
Next in thread: WillTier@aol.com: "Re: First year for mgnum engines?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:54:30 EDT