RE: RE: RE: Spanked a Tundra

From: Ryan Stewart (firebird@kymtnnet.org)
Date: Wed Sep 13 2000 - 11:24:48 EDT


I believe it 240HP, not 265. :)

-Ryan
99 DA RC R/T

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net]On Behalf Of Steven St.Laurent
Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2000 12:13 PM
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Subject: RE: DML: RE: RE: Spanked a Tundra

BAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAH. Now that was good. BAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA. I have
to pass the word around at work about the commercial. But I did hear of a
2002 Explorer being the same size carrying the same number of seats. The
engine is rated around 265HP but what is lost is a mystery too the rear.

---------------------------------------------------
Steve St.Laurent
2000 Dakota 4.7L, CC, Soon to be Supercharged
1999 Chebby
1993 Suzuki Tracker (Geo) 1.6L
Aspiring for a V-10 GTS-R

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net]On Behalf Of Ed Halterman
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 9:56 PM
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Subject: Re: DML: RE: RE: Spanked a Tundra

Well Steven, if you see a Durango commercial soon, notice how they say
"it's sized perfectly between the toys and the tanks".

Ed "Olznut" Halterman Sunland, Ca
'97 Dakota SLT+ CC Auto, 3.9L V-6, 160hp Soon to get the Fabtech
treatment!!
'66 Olds F-85, 5.4L V-8, will have 350hp Soon to be Intense Blue!!

http://community.webtv.net/OLZNUT/WelcometoOlznuts



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:54:33 EDT