Re: platinum or regular 5224 for 3.9l

From: Jack Paulson (cybermail1@yahoo.com)
Date: Sun Sep 17 2000 - 21:21:43 EDT

Next message: Robert Trottman: "Re: prelim install page"
Previous message: Jon Smith: "Re: platinum or regular 5224 for 3.9l"
Maybe in reply to: bud: "platinum or regular 5224 for 3.9l"
Next in thread: Bernd D. Ratsch: "RE: platinum or regular 5224 for 3.9l"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

They are supose to last longer.

I don't know if there are any performace issues. (?)

--- bud <almega@dmrtc.net> wrote:
> Hello,
> I saw that autolite makes a 5224 platinum plug, is
> there any good reason
> to pay the extra for the platinum plug??
> Thanks,
> Mark
>

Next message: Robert Trottman: "Re: prelim install page"
Previous message: Jon Smith: "Re: platinum or regular 5224 for 3.9l"
Maybe in reply to: bud: "platinum or regular 5224 for 3.9l"
Next in thread: Bernd D. Ratsch: "RE: platinum or regular 5224 for 3.9l"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:54:37 EDT