RE: 5.2 vs. 4.7

From: Curt Coulter (curt@cjnetworking.com)
Date: Fri Sep 29 2000 - 20:13:07 EDT


I'll second that! You can have the 4.7, more HP AND more MPG, AND it
doesn't sound like a coffee can full of ball bearings on 87 gas (with a
higher compression ratio to boot!).

Was a no brainer for me.

/Curt

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net]On Behalf Of Steven St.Laurent
> Sent: Friday, September 29, 2000 7:44 PM
> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> Subject: RE: DML: 5.2 vs. 4.7
>
>
> Sure if you want to go slow and be
> outdated..flaming....yowzeeeeerrrrrrr......run FOREST! RUN!
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> Steve St.Laurent
> 2000 Dakota 4.7L, CC, Soon to be Supercharged
> 1999 Chebby gone in 2003
> 1993 Suzuki Tracker (Geo) 1.6L
> COMING SOON
> 2003 Aspiring for a V-10 GTS-R
> 2003 Dodge Dakota 5.7 Hemi R/T



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:55:05 EDT