Re: Re: 3.73s or 4.10s? I need advice

From: NVMYDakota@aol.com
Date: Sat Sep 30 2000 - 23:05:34 EDT


In a message dated 9/29/00 7:18:01 PM Mountain Daylight Time,
firebird@kymtnnet.org writes:

> WHy not 3.92? That's what R/Ts) have...... Best of both worlds, righ tin the
> middle. :)

Well, Ill look, but from what ym friend said (I thoguht they were 3.93s) he
said that they don't amke em for the 8.25. The R/Ts are 9.25 rearends so
maybe they make them for that. Then again, is 3.55's are fast right now, a
3.73 would be another improvement...

Greg

I'll cehck out sothing in-between...



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:55:08 EDT