Re: R/T Buybacks

From: Andy Levy (andylevy@bigfoot.com)
Date: Sun Oct 01 2000 - 22:39:43 EDT

Next message: Tim Berry: "Re: New best E.T, and some other bad news..."
Previous message: durling@attglobal.net: "Re: Airbags ATTN:Jeff Durling and Pat in Balt."
In reply to: GtRWzrd@aol.com: "R/T Buybacks"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Suspension drop and performance-oriented wheels & tires resulted in less
load-carrying ability. Plus, I think it put the rear diff/axle too
close to the truck; on a big bump with a load, you could do some serious
damage.

GtRWzrd@aol.com wrote:
>
> I know I have asked this before, but does anyone know specifically why teh 98
> and 99 R/T's couldnt tow the advertised weight?? I heard it was suspension,
> but I am starting to wonder if it is the transmission. Anyone know for sure?
> Thanks
> Aaron

-- -andy

http://home.twcny.rr.com/andylevy/ --- andylevy@bigfoot.com ------------------------------------------------------------- "We like AMD. The enemy of our enemy is our friend." --- Jonathan Schwartz Sun senior vice president -------------------------------------------------------------

Next message: Tim Berry: "Re: New best E.T, and some other bad news..."
Previous message: durling@attglobal.net: "Re: Airbags ATTN:Jeff Durling and Pat in Balt."
In reply to: GtRWzrd@aol.com: "R/T Buybacks"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:55:44 EDT