Bob,
Im beginning to think I dont really need my guages and the like .5 seconds+
on the ET with the 96 computer.!!... 5600 RPM is way too high a shift point
for the stock cam and heads/intake combo without a centrifugal blower...
Bruce
----- Original Message -----
From: Bob Tom <tigers@bserv.com>
To: <dakota-truck@BUFFNET.NET>
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2000 4:07 PM
Subject: Re: DML: is: Scanner owners !total timing...was Re: Where Is
Everyone From ?????
> At 12:33 PM 10/19/00 +0300, you wrote:
> >Thanks! I suspected the 96 and earlier PCMs had more timing than the
later
> >perf units...Must verify! Im thinking my 98 truck is still missing a few
> >degrees (19-20 deg @ WOT rock solid) Id like to see at least 25deg. How
> >did the custom flash PCM effect your times? Bruce
>
> I ran it twice during opening day at the track this year. I let the
> tranny shift by itself and then did a manual shift run. Both runs gave
> 15.8x. This computer was also recalibrated for 5600 rpm shift points
> (shifts were dead on on both runs). 60' times were 2.289 and 2.303.
> 1/8 times were 10.127 and 10.171. On the third run, I swapped in my
> '96 MP PCM and promptly ran a 15.2x with lower manual shift points (~5000)
> and had problems getting the 2-3 upshift. 60' time was 2.121 and 1/8 time
> was 9.631
>
> No more runs that day as it was free entry and every vehicle in Ontario
> must have been there :-)
>
> Bob
>
> BTW, I also recorded the '97 MP PCM CA version (no fed version for the
auto.).
> Under WOT, spark advance ranged from 7 to 28 degrees advance. There is a
> 22 to 7 degree retard at the 1-2 shift and a 26 to 15 degrees retard at
the
> 2-3 shift (for CA emission standards, I believe). Two runs with this
computer
> gave a 15.854 (auto. shift) and a 15.523 (manual shift). The third run
> with the '96 MP PCM got me a 14.908.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:56:12 EDT