I agree.
I read that article last night when I get home and found it quite
astonishing. Maybe it was wrong to switch to a copperhead versus a double
platinum plug.
In the article it does call out for platinum use on a small voltage
over-plug-coil system.
---------------------------------------------------
Steve St.Laurent
2000 Dakota 4.7L, CC, Soon to be Supercharged
1999 Chebby gone in 2003
1993 Suzuki Tracker (Geo) 1.6L
COMING SOON
2003 Aspiring for a V-10 GTS-R
2003 Dodge Dakota 5.7 Hemi R/T
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net]On Behalf Of Steven T. Ekstrand
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2000 9:02 PM
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Subject: DML: Re: Re: 3923's in a 4.7L-HELP!!! Platinum vs. Copper
| Plain and simple, MSD says not to use Platinum plugs with their ignition
| systems. They must know something, atleast more than I do if they say
dont.
| -Kyle
HELLO???? This is what I f*cking mean...
Does anybody read the posts they comment on???
Just because I will not run a Platinum plug in my MSD 7AL2 equipted 450 hp
small block Cuda has ZERO bearing on whether or not it is appropriate for a
total wus out lameass piece of crap low voltage ignition like Ma' Mopar
gave the 4.7L.
NOW, can somebody give me a reason why I shouldn't run Double Platinum's on
MY application. Not some MSD 6A equipted V6.
If I am to understand the Chrysler tech correctly, the stock Champion for a
4.7L is a Double Platinum plug. Although that surprises me because the
owners manual calls for frequent plug changes on the 4.7.
-STE
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:56:13 EDT