RE: RE: RE: Ouch on 4.7 on truckin magazine!

From: Chris Lang (langerdak@hotmail.com)
Date: Wed Oct 25 2000 - 11:36:57 EDT


Sounds like it Steven. They probbably got a V6 and were confused since they
dont have the markers up front anymore.

Chris

>From: Stlaurent Mr Steven <STLAURENTS@mctssa.usmc.mil>
>Reply-To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
>To: "'dakota-truck@buffnet.net'" <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
>Subject: RE: DML: RE: RE: Ouch on 4.7 on truckin magazine!
>Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 08:10:37 -0700
>
>I thinking about the remark from previous post that it was an error on
>engine size versus output Dynoed.
>
>-------------------------------------------
>Steven St.Laurent
>Test Engineer
>Test Branch, GSD, MCTSSA
>MARCORSYSCOM, USMC
>760-725-2506 (DSN 365-2506)
>Work:mailto:stlaurents@mctssa.usmc.mil
>Home:mailto:saint1958@home.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
>From: bernd@texas.net [mailto:bernd@texas.net]
>Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2000 2:48 AM
>To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
>Subject: Re: DML: RE: RE: Ouch on 4.7 on truckin magazine!
>
>
>I've physically seen from 148-152RWHP for a 100% stock Dodge Dakota V6 on a
>Dyno. Factory rates them at 175HP (Which is pretty close to what the Dyno
>shows with driveline loss added back in.)
>
>- Bernd
>
>
> > What is the factory rating for a V-6 and stock dyno run?
> >
> > -------------------------------------------
> > Steven St.Laurent
>

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:56:23 EDT