Anemic V6

From: Ronald Wong (ron-wong@home.com)
Date: Wed Oct 25 2000 - 13:17:31 EDT

Next message: GSWillhite: "Øff topic Civil Warship Monitor was: Dateline"
Previous message: GSWillhite: "Re: RE: Dateline report...GO DURANGO!!!"
Next in thread: bernd@texas.net: "Re: Anemic V6"
Maybe reply: bernd@texas.net: "Re: Anemic V6"
Maybe reply: bernd@texas.net: "Re: Anemic V6"
Maybe reply: A. S.: "Re: Anemic V6"
Reply: Tim Berry: "Re: Anemic V6"
Maybe reply: David A: "Re: Anemic V6"
Maybe reply: Seth Hollander: "RE: Anemic V6"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Hey, I figured out why the V6 is anemic. Let's see, V6 vs V8 = 2 cyl less
so V6 is 75% of V8.

75% of 5.9 is 4.4 and the V6 is only 3.9. What happened to the other ½
liter?

Ooooh man.....here it comes. Watch Bruce...you'll see your first squabble.

Ron
00 SLT QC 4X2 5.9 46RE 3.92 LSD
For modifications see my DML Profile

Next message: GSWillhite: "Øff topic Civil Warship Monitor was: Dateline"
Previous message: GSWillhite: "Re: RE: Dateline report...GO DURANGO!!!"
Next in thread: bernd@texas.net: "Re: Anemic V6"
Maybe reply: bernd@texas.net: "Re: Anemic V6"
Maybe reply: bernd@texas.net: "Re: Anemic V6"
Maybe reply: A. S.: "Re: Anemic V6"
Reply: Tim Berry: "Re: Anemic V6"
Maybe reply: David A: "Re: Anemic V6"
Maybe reply: Seth Hollander: "RE: Anemic V6"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:56:24 EDT