Thanks for the tip. I had previously looked at Rhino and Line-X and I
wanted to go with Line-X because it seemed more durable and not quite as
soft. I will check into Speedliner too!
Cliff
At 12:00 AM 12/13/00 -0500, you wrote:
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 22:35:31 -0600
>From: "Gary Fanning" <Gary@Fanning.net>
>Subject: DML: Re: Now that I have 2K on my 2K1...
>
>I have the Line-x bedliner in my '00 QC. It's ok, but if I could do it
>again, I'd go with Speedliner. I have had Line-x and Speedliner spray some
>other components, and have spent a little time in each of these two dealers;
>should have done that before hand. It may be just my area, but the Line-x
>dealer's shop is a total mess; I'm sure a big part of that is the use of
>high-pressure application versus low-pressure. The quality difference I see
>I believe is due to control; high-pressure and less control. Components
>I've had sprayed, by both, you could see an uneven application of product
>from Line-x and pin holes. I then scraped, grinded, sanded and had
>Speedliner applied. My bed has a few areas of thicker material. Also,
>Line-x applies the product very thick; the tail-gate doesn't close as flush
>as it use to; even after Line-x grinding some of the material. If you want
>a product that is harder with less tack, Line-x works.
>
>Gary Fanning
>'00 QC 4x4 4.7L 3.92 lsd
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:57:58 EDT