Re: Anyone running 4.10s? (4.10 -vs- 3.92) (Getting new gears Tues)

From: ABadDakota (bad93dakota@yahoo.com)
Date: Fri Dec 22 2000 - 18:18:39 EST


I have a 93 CC 5.2 auto and went from 3.55 to
3.91 and it felt like 50 HP. I was a little
hesitant as are you about the 4.10's. I have
4.10's in my 68 SS396 Chevelle and I did not want
my truck RPM to be that high on highway, but I
figure we do have OD. I am sure the 4.10's would
be fine, but I am VERY happy with my 3.91's.

Tom

Just my .02
--- "William H. Hiatt III" <william@hiatt.net>
wrote:
> Well, Tuesday I get my gears installed. My
> question is this: (I know, I
> feel like I'm beating this to death) I have a
> 2000 CC 4.7L Auto. I have the
> factory 3.55. I have P275/60R17 (30") So, I'm
> running a 3.33 overall with
> the new tires. My question. Would it be too
> much to go with the 4.10's? I
> was told this would give me an overall 3.92.
> Would this be too much for my
> motor? I would like to keep my truck up to
> about 110,000miles. If I'm
> cruising on the highway at around 3000rpm, is
> this too much? What are the
> long term effects on the motor, if any? I'm
> religious about changing my oil
> & filter every 3,000 miles. Mobil-1 5W-30
> synthetic and K&N HP-2004. Will
> the 4.10s give me excellent performance? Both
> street and track? Will the
> 3.92s give me similar performance. I guess, I
> want to have the fastest
> truck, both high-end and low-end. So which is
> the best?
>
> Thanks for all your help
> william.
>

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products.
http://shopping.yahoo.com/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:58:06 EDT