Re: Removing carbon build up??

• Next message: Andy Levy: "Re: Shaker"
• Previous message: Brent Barts: "Re: Re: Fw: Re: Anyone have a MTX thunderform?"
• Maybe in reply to: Mike Styer: "Removing carbon build up??"
• Next in thread: Bernd D. Ratsch: "RE: Removing carbon build up??"
• Reply: Bernd D. Ratsch: "RE: Removing carbon build up??"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

If I agree with your statement, but yet I'm wrong, doesn't that make you
wrong also?
Patrick Delgado

>
> Sorry Patrick...in this case you're wrong.
>
> - Bernd
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dakota-truck@BUFFNET.NET
> Subject: Re: DML: Re: RE: Removing carbon build up??
>
> I just used 12 oz/30 secs as an arbitrary figure to illustrate to Chris the
> difference beween trickling water into the tb versus letting an in-fender
> air intake suck as much water as it can. My point is still valid(even more
> so with your 8 oz/2 min flowrate).
> Patrick Delgado

>>
>> (12 oz water/30 secs) X (1 gal/128 oz) X (7.8 gal/ 1 cu ft) = a tiny bit

                            (v e r s u s)

>> 2000 cc displacement X (5000 revolutions/1 minute) = a(engine-busting)lot
>> Patrick Delgado
>>
>

• Next message: Andy Levy: "Re: Shaker"
• Previous message: Brent Barts: "Re: Re: Fw: Re: Anyone have a MTX thunderform?"
• Maybe in reply to: Mike Styer: "Removing carbon build up??"
• Next in thread: Bernd D. Ratsch: "RE: Removing carbon build up??"
• Reply: Bernd D. Ratsch: "RE: Removing carbon build up??"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:58:31 EDT