Well, yeah, but that's not exactly a racing machine, is it! :-)
I guess they do it (someone noted the Cheb 8.1 V8), but for all you
engine-eers out there, is there a point of diminishing returns on
displacement, where the mass gets too large to move fast enough (or get up
to speed fast enough) to produce the powerband you need for a performance
engine?
- A
> I grew up driving old John Deere tractors. 326 cubic inches on two
> cylinders, or about 2 2/3 liter/cylinder. This was not the largest one
> either!
>
> Cal
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:58:33 EDT