I have to disagree with the like's of Powerdyne dyno test. The physical
proprieties of the S&B cone can be proven by flow metrics and K&N has some
spin-off that look like the S&B version. Look at the old 4-barrel filter
with the side and top is now a filter.
-------------------------------------------
Steven St.Laurent
Test Engineer
Test Branch, GSD, MCTSSA
MARCORSYSCOM, USMC
760-725-2506 (DSN 365-2506)
Work:mailto:stlaurents@mctssa.usmc.mil
Home:mailto:saint1958@home.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Patrick Delgado [mailto:dadoctah@vitelcom.net]
Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2001 3:15 PM
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Subject: Re: DML: a better cone air filter
I've seen both sites and was very interested. They promise 40%(?) more
airflow than an equivalently sized "conventional"(maybe paper?) filter. I
asked powerdyne about that same air filter; If it would help any if I
replaced the K&N that came with my blower kit with one of those. They said
no. They added that many dyno tests have proven K&N's superiority. And that
S&B's were a k&N copy with alot of hype. Not my words, Powerdyne's.
Patrick Delgado
> it looks like somebody improved a good idea and made better look here
> http://www.autophysics.com/ here is a place to buy
> http://intenseperformance.com/products/cone_filters/cone_filters.html I
> will buy one and report the results
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:58:40 EDT