Sorry Michael and Jay, I was interrupted while conversing two e-mail and
lost train of thought.
Michael, let illustrate by using the Sun as the example...
There may be a serious immediate objection to the idea that the 'LIGHT OF
THE SUN MAY BE LIGHT BORROWED" from some other Star, however near or so far,
luminous or hot, seems obvious to any rational individual who merely
observes and compares the Sun and the Stars from his vantage point on the
Earth.
It would appear from direct observations, even with the naked eye, that
millions of times more (at least ordinary visible) light is emitted from the
Sun than could possible fall onto the Sun from all the Stars of the universe
combined. Is it any wonder, therefore that scientists have not even
considered the necessity, except in a relatively few instance, of looking
beyond the Sun itself for the primary source of its tremendous, seemingly
unending supply of radiant energy?
Indeed, one might even considered naïve to suggest such a thing. Yet even
in the early secular history, ancient scrolls before the time of the founder
of Egypt by Egyptus, daughter of Ham, a prophet name Abraham (early scroll
found in the mid 1800s) described this event how the light is emitted from
one Star to another Star. Perhaps, the most mysterious wonder of the
universe to the source of the light of the Sun.
The current, almost universally held and practically unquestioned,
explanation of the primary source of radiant energy is the BETHE-GAMOV
theory that light is generated in the hot (20 million degree centigrade)
interior of the Sun by the now familiar 'HYDROGEN-to-HELIUM', the
thermonuclear reaction called "Carbon-Nitrogen Cycle". Did not the
scientific world demonstrate this theory conclusively in the development of
the Hydrogen Bomb?
This is where religion and science are one when it is explained that the
Lord included in His definition of light not only the Photons, that one
ordinarily calls light, which emanate from the Sun, but also all forms of
light (which is actually the more general scientific usage of the term
light) that one finds in the scientific world, namely the whole light
spectrum from radio waves to cosmic rays.
Evidently, the true explanation lies in the observed hard and soft cosmic
radiation of stripped atoms and hydrogen atoms studied extensively during
the past half century, and especially in the observed accretion processes
first described by the famous British astronomer, Fred Hoyle.
In Hoyle's book entitled RECENT RESEARCHES IN SOLAR PHYSICS he made an
elegant and convincing case of the concept that the previously obscure
characteristic of the Sun's corona are to be understood as due to actual
material, primarily hydrogen, falling into the Sun in an effective spherical
distribution from virtually infinite distance from the Sun. Spectroscopic
evidence indicates that the temperature increases with distance from the Sun
from about 6,000 degrees Kelvin, or 11,000 degrees Fahrenheit at the surface
or "photosphere" of the Sun to tens of millions of degree at distances of
only one or two solar diameters from the Sun. If the Sun's interior were
the primary source of energy, how does it happen that heat flows from the
colder surface of the Sun 'uphill' to the tremendously hotter (reference to
chapter 2) regions of the upper chromospheres and the Corona? This seems
contrary to anything natural; in the terrestrial environment heat always
flows the hot to the cold body, not from the cold to the hot one. To be
sure, various theories have been advanced to account for this strange
condition of the Sun, but none seems particularly convincing. On the other
hand, the temperature contour outward from the Sun has a simple and
convincing explanation if one considers a model in which the primary energy
source is exterior to the Sun.
If matter were to fall freely from effectively infinite distance into the
Sun, its effective temperature, upon arriving at the Sun, determining by the
gravitational potential of the Sun, would be roughly the same as that
actually found in the corona where this accretion material first suffers
strong enough scattering by collisions among accreting atoms for temperature
to become meaningful. This was pointed by Hoyle and his explanation seems
perfectly natural. It now appears that tremendous quantities of matter are
flowing into the Sun from outer space. This flux of matter into the Sun
may, in fact, be responsible not only for the corona, or the "halo" of the
Sun, but also for the light of the Sun, the so-called "solar constant".
(kinetic energy)
I will stop here for now, since time and space is the priority. This may be
long but is not what is being taught at your local education
facility...hehehehehe
-------------------------------------------
Steven St.Laurent
Test Engineer
Test Branch, GSD, MCTSSA
MARCORSYSCOM, USMC
760-725-2506 (DSN 365-2506)
Work:mailto:stlaurents@mctssa.usmc.mil
Home:mailto:saint1958@home.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Hamilton [mailto:MHamilton@ehelp.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2001 3:31 PM
To: 'dakota-truck@buffnet.net'
Subject: RE: DML: OPEC
... and the average birth kinetic energy of a delayed neutron precursor is?
-----Original Message-----
From: Stlaurent Mr Steven [mailto:STLAURENTS@mctssa.usmc.mil]
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2001 2:52 PM
To: 'dakota-truck@buffnet.net'
Subject: RE: DML: OPEC
The same is applied to Nuclear Devices. These devices are not more than a
geometric device and it requires the Sun to be in a relative position to the
Earth (Light Harmonics) to cause the explosion or mushroom cloud.
-------------------------------------------
Steven St.Laurent
Test Engineer
Test Branch, GSD, MCTSSA
MARCORSYSCOM, USMC
760-725-2506 (DSN 365-2506)
Work:mailto:stlaurents@mctssa.usmc.mil
Home:mailto:saint1958@home.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Patrick Delgado [mailto:dadoctah@vitelcom.net]
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2001 3:21 AM
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Subject: Re: DML: OPEC
It reduces "Buckling".
Patrick Delgado
> Ask your dad why Nuclear power plants are placed in geometric location to
> produce optimal nuclear reaction.
>
> --------------------------------------
> Steven St.Laurent
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:58:41 EDT