I would disagree the last statement, since the exhaust system is not much of
a gain for the 4.7 design. The largest gain you will find is in the TB,
Cold Air, spark plugs, thermostat and now with a auto (CC version), I have
around 218rwhp/283rwTQ. The shorty headers may only provide around 9HP and
the exhaust from 1.9-3.0HP.
-------------------------------------------
Steven St.Laurent
Test Engineer
Test Branch, GSD, MCTSSA
MARCORSYSCOM, USMC
760-725-2506 (DSN 365-2506)
Work:mailto:stlaurents@mctssa.usmc.mil
Home:mailto:saint1958@home.com
-----Original Message-----
From: WOT or waiting at a Red [mailto:dakatack@home.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 9:45 AM
To: dakota-truck@BUFFNET.NET
Subject: DML: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Question on TB for the 2000 4.7
Richard
I'm working the opposite direction, no particular reason. I have the Ztube
and TB done, next catback then headers then chip.
Is there any advantage to either of our strategies?
Patrick O'Day
----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard R" <richster@san.rr.com>
To: <dakota-truck-moderator@bent.twistedbits.net>
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 7:27 AM
Subject: DML: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Question on TB for the 2000 4.7
> I want to first open up the exhaust side of things before I feed it more
> air. Headers and or muffler first.
>
> --
> Richard
> ""WOT or waiting at a Red"" <dakatack@home.com> wrote in message
> news:008501c08a64$e3acf6e0$6026b018@potlnd1.or.home.com...
> > Are you going to port and polish it?
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Richard R" <richster@san.rr.com>
> > To: <dakota-truck-moderator@bent.twistedbits.net>
> > Sent: Monday, January 29, 2001 3:52 PM
> > Subject: DML: Re: Re: Re: Question on TB for the 2000 4.7
> >
> >
> > > Thanks Patrick! It is deemed a 68mm per the part numbers. The Quick
D
> > > intake made it easy to check.
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Richard
> > > ""WOT or waiting at a Red"" <dakatack@home.com> wrote in message
> > > news:003d01c08a47$a42b8300$6026b018@potlnd1.or.home.com...
> > > > Richard
> > > >
> > > > There is a stap on the top of the TB
> > > > 53013241AC is a 65mm
> > > > 53013163AA is a 68mm
> > > >
> > > > Also it's stamped with the size on the blade. You will need to use a
> > > mirror
> > > > to see it.
> > > >
> > > > Patrick O'Day
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Richard R" <richster@san.rr.com>
> > > > To: <dakota-truck-moderator@bent.twistedbits.net>
> > > > Sent: Monday, January 29, 2001 1:29 PM
> > > > Subject: DML: Re: Question on TB for the 2000 4.7
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > I have a 2001 QC 4.7 built in October of 2000, how can I tell if I
> > have
> > > > the
> > > > > 68mm throttle body?
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Richard
> > > > > <RobertE.Tucker@gunter.af.mil> wrote in message
> > > > > news:6E8C7034C8875D41A80E36C22E15B43016FA0D@FSJUBJ08...
> > > > > > I am looking to upgrade the TB on my 2000 4.7L and have a
> question:
> > > > Would
> > > > > > it be better to replace the original 65MM TB on the 2000 4.7L
with
> a
> > > > > QuickD
> > > > > > version, or to simply replace it with the 68MM TB from the 2001
> > 4.7L?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Bob Tucker
> > > > > > 2000 CC, 4.7, 3.92 ASD,
> > > > > > IP Cold Air Intake
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:58:48 EDT