Re: DML:Magnum 3.9 vs Mitsubishi 3.0 V6's...which is better?

From: mike kulczycki (dakota1994@hotmail.com)
Date: Wed Feb 07 2001 - 22:09:13 EST


my parents had an 88 minivan with a 3.0. it was all right for power, but
that van sucked... the motor finally went at around 120,000 miles. it
started overheating and something cracked, because when you poured water in
the radiator, it came out the tailpipe... my 94 with a 3.9 runs awesome
with 92,000 miles. no problems ever.... and there are many more 3.9 out
there with tons of miles...
mike k

>
>In a message dated 2/7/01 4:31:26 PM Eastern Standard Time,
>dodgedakotaquadcab@hotmail.com writes:
>
> > Ok list,i have a friend who is a mechanic.He swears that the Mitsubishi
>3.0
> > V6(i had a van with one)is a better engine,and will last longer than my
> > venerable Magnum 3.9 V6.
> >
> >
> > I say the Magnum V6 is tougher & better...
> >
> >
> > any statements,opinions,etc???
>
>I got both....the 3.0 is definitely a mean ass engine, and may actually
>beat
>out a 3.9 in a race, but it doesn't have the torque a 3.9 has.
> Depends on what you're looking for....
>
>
> -Austin
>Vipertruck - "The Anti-Rice"
>Supercharged 6.0 V8
> <A HREF="www.angelfire.com/ny/vipertruck">The Vipertruck</A>
>

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:59:11 EDT