Steve,
Thank you for your response. To be honest, I have missed quite a few
post on the whole "L" thing (on purpose). If Ted O. did use that language, I
do not know which context it was meant in. Therefore I can neither defend or
argue against it.
Your post caught my attention and I responded. Was that the smartest
move on my part considering I haven't been following this whole thing ...
probably not. And for that I offer a handshake and a beer (or scotch if you
prefer).
Now, in the immortal words of Rodney King, "Can't we all just get
along?". There's no hard feelings on my part and I hope none on yours.
Dak content: Steve - I see your Dak has 3:66 gears. I've never heard of
3:66's before. Did you swap them out?
Chuck Robbins
'99 Dakota Sport
www.intense99dak.com
> I agree it was wrong to take it to a personal level. Ted O, I apologise.
>
> But Chuck, several of Ted's response posts have responded with "boy" or
other
> demeaning phrases. Why is it that I get flamed and not Ted for taking it
to aa
> personal level?
>
> Steve
> 00 CC Sport+ 4.7L Auto 3.66 LSD
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:59:11 EDT