Re: RE: Magnum 3.9 vs Mitsubishi 3.0 V6's...which is better?

From: Chris Lambert (mopar88@efortress.com)
Date: Thu Feb 08 2001 - 20:39:40 EST


I follow you... as soon as the 8 is ready, run a 300hp shot in the 6 till
she lows, then time for the 8 that can handle the nos? that is what you
were thinking wasn't it?

Chris

> > > Ok list,i have a friend who is a mechanic.He swears that the Mitsubishi
>3.0
> > > V6(i had a van with one)is a better engine,and will last longer than my
> > > venerable Magnum 3.9 V6.<<
>
>on a negative note, my 3.9 Premag 6er has always been a rough idling motor.
>It has literally shaken itself to death. Both main seals are gone, I go
>through valve cover gaskets like it's nothing, and there's enough blowby so
>that smoke comes out of my valve cover breather constantly. 1 qt. of oil a
>week, 165k miles. I babied that truck the first 4 years I owned it (bought
>it in 95), but now that it's falling apart no matter how good I treat it I
>figure I'm just gonna' run it into the ground... got a new motor and
>everything for it anyway... Anyone got some N2O layin' around?
>
>- -miggity
>
>PROJECT 13's --> slammed 88 Dakota / 360 swap in progress!!
>miggitymike@fast4x4.net
>http://surf.to.Project13s
>
>"STOCK SUCKS!"

***********************************************************************************
'00 CC, Packin a 287 Magnum, 5-sp, Gibson Duals, Quick D Intake
http://www.intense99dak.com/chris.htm
In Action: http://www.dakota2.4mg.com/scca.htm
***********************************************************************************



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:59:11 EDT