Re: EARNHARDT WAS PART OF THE PROBLEM!! was Re: I found this on Fox

From: Hemipower@aol.com
Date: Mon Feb 19 2001 - 11:21:50 EST


In a message dated 02/19/2001 11:09:10 AM EST, gswillhite@ualr.edu writes:

> Let me say I watched the whole race start to finish and
> I don't think I've ever seen a more aggressive driver than
> Earnhardt. The guy was driving one handed sometimes
> and appeared to be flipping other drivers off. He reminded
> me of some runaway rookie in this race by making wild
> moves down low trying to block others including what
> appeared to be his big mistake * trying to cut off Sterling
> Marlin by sliding down and bumping Marlin front right
> fender*. HE DIDN'T HAVE THE ROOM!!! He appeared
> to be arrogant as hell with no repect for anyone and was
> on a mission to stop anyone who tried to pass. When you
> loose respect for that kinda of speed and other drivers
> physical space somethings bound to happen. That said I
> just want to say NASCAR must share the blame. You
> can't have so many aggressive drivers bunched up running
> 3 wide for 200 laps. I think Earnhardt was a great driver,
> but this time his lack of respect and the new NASCAR rules
> in this race was a lethal combination.

I agree for the most part except for laying blame on NASCAR.
DE should not have been trying so hard to block other
racers. His objective should have been to get AHEAD
of his teammate not hamper the effort of others.
I think the outcome would have been different.
Racing is not an exact science, nor should it be.
I think the rule changes are experimental and we have no
idea of the out come until they are tried.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:59:20 EDT