Of course he did not "DESERVE to die".
Thats very dramatic, you going for an oscar?
Something nice, ok I'll quote part of my
earlier post you just quoted. "I think
Earnhardt was a great Driver".
Piehole...
Grow up Spanky
GS -
<<
From: moses@solarstop.net (Mark Ferrari)
Subject: DML: Re: EARNHARDT WAS PART OF THE PROBLEM!! was Re: I found this
on Fox
You make it sound like the whole thing was his fault. Do you think he
DESERVED to die??!? Say somthing nice or keep your pie hole closed.
- ----- Original Message -----
From: "George S Willhite" <gswillhite@ualr.edu>
To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2001 1:06 PM
Subject: DML: EARNHARDT WAS PART OF THE PROBLEM!! was Re: I found this on
Fox
> Let me say I watched the whole race start to finish and
> I don't think I've ever seen a more aggressive driver than
> Earnhardt. The guy was driving one handed sometimes
> and appeared to be flipping other drivers off. He reminded
> me of some runaway rookie in this race by making wild
> moves down low trying to block others including what
> appeared to be his big mistake * trying to cut off Sterling
> Marlin by sliding down and bumping Marlin front right
> fender*. HE DIDN'T HAVE THE ROOM!!! He appeared
> to be arrogant as hell with no repect for anyone and was
> on a mission to stop anyone who tried to pass. When you
> loose respect for that kinda of speed and other drivers
> physical space somethings bound to happen. That said I
> just want to say NASCAR must share the blame. You
> can't have so many aggressive drivers bunched up running
> 3 wide for 200 laps. I think Earnhardt was a great driver,
> but this time his lack of respect and the new NASCAR rules
> in this race was a lethal combination.
>
> GS -
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:59:20 EDT