For some reason I dont think this made it to the list the first time... if
i'm blind, I apologize!
Are they trying to say that you have to have a lower education level to
drive a Dakota? I think their stats are a bit loopy to say the least. We
really should email them like someone said, but they'd probably just laugh
:)
Anyways... I'm finally through reading all of these posts from the past two
days. My main machine got a virus so my access to email is quite limited.
BTW... I see you work at Boeing based on the email address... so, you think
you may be able to get me a little discount on one of those jet engines for
my truck? hehe. j/k.
Jared (Going Skiing through Thurs so I wont be replying to anything until
then)
1994 Dodge Dakota Sport V6 3.9L Auto, K&N Air Filter, Lund Deflector,
Craftec Hard Tonneau Cover (on order), Duraliner, Inaccurate Outdoor
Thermometer.
Added Sill Plates and Door Scratch Guards.
--Original Message--
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 09:16:14 -0800
From: "Woodruff, Jason P" <Jason.Woodruff@West.Boeing.com>
Subject: Re: DML: cartalk response
They called me too educated and to high of an income to drive a Dak, I guess
I can live with that. They also said snob, high risk taker, and frugal
(cheap). I'd have to say pretty accurate. At least my first recommended
car was a Pick-up, in fact my last vehicle is exactly what they said I
should drive! And they called me a Rocket Scientist, which I am, weird huh.
Here's my form. If you want to know my personality this about sums it up.
http://cartalk.cars.com/Survey/Results/Psychographics/Caroscopes/444579x6236
.html
Jay W
4.7L Auto Sport+ C.C. 2wd Black
Mods Profile page at
http://www.twistedbits.net/WWWProfile/dakota/Re5X8z5la@Ix2/profile.htm
-------------------------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:59:21 EDT